October 8, 2025

13 mins

AI Observability & Reliability Engineering for Agentic Systems

Key takeaway: Agents fail in production for predictable reasons—non-determinism, tail latency, rate limits, retrieval drift, unsafe tooling, and weak observability. Treat them like distributed systems: define SLIs/SLOs, add evals + tracing, enforce guardrails (allow-listed tools, human-in-the-loop), and pin versions.
Google SRE: SLOs & SLIs · OpenAI: Rate limits & backoff · Google: The Tail at Scale · OWASP: Top 10 for LLM Apps · NIST AI RMF

Why demos lie (and production doesn’t)

Demos are single-threaded, happy-path, and lightly provisioned. Production is adversarial, concurrent, and rate-limited.

The Reliability Stack for AI Agents

Think SRE for agents: define SLIs/SLOs → evaluate offline/online → observe every step → control autonomy → mitigate risks.

1) Define SLIs & SLOs for agent workflows

Category

SLI (what to measure)

Example SLO

How to measure

Answer quality

Faithfulness (0–1), answer relevancy

≥0.85 faithfulness p95 over rolling 7d

Ragas, LangSmith/Phoenix evals

Latency

End-to-end p95; tool-call p95

p95 < 2.0s

Tracing (Langfuse/LangSmith/Phoenix)

Retrieval

Context recall@k / precision@k

recall@5 ≥ 0.80

RAG eval (Qdrant/Pinecone guides)

Safety

Prompt-injection block rate; unsafe-output rate

≥99% blocks; <0.1% unsafe

OWASP checks; Content Safety

Cost

Tokens/request; tool-call count

≤$X per successful task

Tracing usage + budgeting

Sources:
Ragas metrics · Qdrant: RAG evaluation · Pinecone: RAG eval · Implementing SLOs

2) Evaluate early and continuously (offline + online)

3) Observe everything (traces, tools, costs)

4) Control autonomy

5) Secure-by-default

Common failure modes → proven fixes

  1. “Same prompt, different answer.”

    • Why: non-determinism, silent model updates, concurrency.

    • Fix: set temperature=0, use seeds when available, pin model versions, run regression evals on every update.
      Temp=0 clarifications · Version pinning

  2. Slow or time-outing flows at peak.

    • Why: tail latency in upstream services; serial tool calls.

    • Fix: parallelize idempotent steps, hedged requests, timeouts with fallback plans; prewarm caches.
      Tail at Scale

  3. Rate-limit storms and 429 cascades.

    • Fix: client-side exponential backoff + jitter, adaptive concurrency, token budgets per route.
      OpenAI: backoff

  4. Prompt injection via RAG or tools.

    • Why: untrusted content is executed as instructions.

    • Fix: content scanning, system-prompt hardening, instruction-following validation, deny by default for tool calls; display provenance.
      OWASP LLM Top 10 · Azure Prompt Shields

  5. RAG answers go off-script.

    • Why: bad chunks, drifted embeddings, weak retrievers.

    • Fix: monitor context recall@k/precision@k, chunk/merge tuning, hybrid (sparse+dense), structured metadata filters; faithfulness scoring.
      Qdrant RAG eval · Pinecone guide · Ragas: Faithfulness

  6. Agent loops & tool thrash.

  7. Context window overflow.

Small comparison: observability & eval tooling


Tool

Best for

Highlights

Links

Langfuse (OSS)

Tracing, cost/latency analytics

OpenTelemetry-native SDK, sessions, scoring

Docs

LangSmith

Agent traces + offline/online eval

LLM-as-judge, datasets, regressions

Docs

Arize Phoenix (OSS)

Open-source evals + traces

Python/TS evals, RAG diagnostics

Docs

Braintrust

Evals at scale + online monitors

Experiments API, online scoring

Docs

Step-by-step rollout: 30 days to production reliability

Days 0–3 — Choose one workflow & write SLOs

Days 4–10 — Build the “thin slice” with guardrails

  • Add max iterations/timeouts, retries with exponential backoff, early abort on repeat error patterns.

  • Instrument tracing for prompts, retrieved context, tool calls, latency, cost.
    OpenAI: backoff · Langfuse

Days 11–18 — Evaluation & hardening

  • Create a 100–500 example golden set; run offline evals (faithfulness, recall@k); fix chunking/hybrid search.

  • Add prompt-injection shields and input sanitization.
    Ragas metrics · OWASP LLM Top 10

Days 19–30 — Pilot with controls

Appendix: RAG metrics that actually matter

Further reading

We’re Here to Help

Ready to transform your operations? We're here to help. Contact us today to learn more about our innovative solutions and expert services.

We’re Here to Help

Ready to transform your operations? We're here to help. Contact us today to learn more about our innovative solutions and expert services.

We’re Here to Help

Ready to transform your operations? We're here to help. Contact us today to learn more about our innovative solutions and expert services.

October 8, 2025

13 mins

AI Observability & Reliability Engineering for Agentic Systems

Key takeaway: Agents fail in production for predictable reasons—non-determinism, tail latency, rate limits, retrieval drift, unsafe tooling, and weak observability. Treat them like distributed systems: define SLIs/SLOs, add evals + tracing, enforce guardrails (allow-listed tools, human-in-the-loop), and pin versions.
Google SRE: SLOs & SLIs · OpenAI: Rate limits & backoff · Google: The Tail at Scale · OWASP: Top 10 for LLM Apps · NIST AI RMF

Why demos lie (and production doesn’t)

Demos are single-threaded, happy-path, and lightly provisioned. Production is adversarial, concurrent, and rate-limited.

The Reliability Stack for AI Agents

Think SRE for agents: define SLIs/SLOs → evaluate offline/online → observe every step → control autonomy → mitigate risks.

1) Define SLIs & SLOs for agent workflows

Category

SLI (what to measure)

Example SLO

How to measure

Answer quality

Faithfulness (0–1), answer relevancy

≥0.85 faithfulness p95 over rolling 7d

Ragas, LangSmith/Phoenix evals

Latency

End-to-end p95; tool-call p95

p95 < 2.0s

Tracing (Langfuse/LangSmith/Phoenix)

Retrieval

Context recall@k / precision@k

recall@5 ≥ 0.80

RAG eval (Qdrant/Pinecone guides)

Safety

Prompt-injection block rate; unsafe-output rate

≥99% blocks; <0.1% unsafe

OWASP checks; Content Safety

Cost

Tokens/request; tool-call count

≤$X per successful task

Tracing usage + budgeting

Sources:
Ragas metrics · Qdrant: RAG evaluation · Pinecone: RAG eval · Implementing SLOs

2) Evaluate early and continuously (offline + online)

3) Observe everything (traces, tools, costs)

4) Control autonomy

5) Secure-by-default

Common failure modes → proven fixes

  1. “Same prompt, different answer.”

    • Why: non-determinism, silent model updates, concurrency.

    • Fix: set temperature=0, use seeds when available, pin model versions, run regression evals on every update.
      Temp=0 clarifications · Version pinning

  2. Slow or time-outing flows at peak.

    • Why: tail latency in upstream services; serial tool calls.

    • Fix: parallelize idempotent steps, hedged requests, timeouts with fallback plans; prewarm caches.
      Tail at Scale

  3. Rate-limit storms and 429 cascades.

    • Fix: client-side exponential backoff + jitter, adaptive concurrency, token budgets per route.
      OpenAI: backoff

  4. Prompt injection via RAG or tools.

    • Why: untrusted content is executed as instructions.

    • Fix: content scanning, system-prompt hardening, instruction-following validation, deny by default for tool calls; display provenance.
      OWASP LLM Top 10 · Azure Prompt Shields

  5. RAG answers go off-script.

    • Why: bad chunks, drifted embeddings, weak retrievers.

    • Fix: monitor context recall@k/precision@k, chunk/merge tuning, hybrid (sparse+dense), structured metadata filters; faithfulness scoring.
      Qdrant RAG eval · Pinecone guide · Ragas: Faithfulness

  6. Agent loops & tool thrash.

  7. Context window overflow.

Small comparison: observability & eval tooling


Tool

Best for

Highlights

Links

Langfuse (OSS)

Tracing, cost/latency analytics

OpenTelemetry-native SDK, sessions, scoring

Docs

LangSmith

Agent traces + offline/online eval

LLM-as-judge, datasets, regressions

Docs

Arize Phoenix (OSS)

Open-source evals + traces

Python/TS evals, RAG diagnostics

Docs

Braintrust

Evals at scale + online monitors

Experiments API, online scoring

Docs

Step-by-step rollout: 30 days to production reliability

Days 0–3 — Choose one workflow & write SLOs

Days 4–10 — Build the “thin slice” with guardrails

  • Add max iterations/timeouts, retries with exponential backoff, early abort on repeat error patterns.

  • Instrument tracing for prompts, retrieved context, tool calls, latency, cost.
    OpenAI: backoff · Langfuse

Days 11–18 — Evaluation & hardening

  • Create a 100–500 example golden set; run offline evals (faithfulness, recall@k); fix chunking/hybrid search.

  • Add prompt-injection shields and input sanitization.
    Ragas metrics · OWASP LLM Top 10

Days 19–30 — Pilot with controls

Appendix: RAG metrics that actually matter

Further reading

We’re Here to Help

Ready to transform your operations? We're here to help. Contact us today to learn more about our innovative solutions and expert services.

We’re Here to Help

Ready to transform your operations? We're here to help. Contact us today to learn more about our innovative solutions and expert services.

We’re Here to Help

Ready to transform your operations? We're here to help. Contact us today to learn more about our innovative solutions and expert services.

October 8, 2025

13 mins

AI Observability & Reliability Engineering for Agentic Systems

Key takeaway: Agents fail in production for predictable reasons—non-determinism, tail latency, rate limits, retrieval drift, unsafe tooling, and weak observability. Treat them like distributed systems: define SLIs/SLOs, add evals + tracing, enforce guardrails (allow-listed tools, human-in-the-loop), and pin versions.
Google SRE: SLOs & SLIs · OpenAI: Rate limits & backoff · Google: The Tail at Scale · OWASP: Top 10 for LLM Apps · NIST AI RMF

Why demos lie (and production doesn’t)

Demos are single-threaded, happy-path, and lightly provisioned. Production is adversarial, concurrent, and rate-limited.

The Reliability Stack for AI Agents

Think SRE for agents: define SLIs/SLOs → evaluate offline/online → observe every step → control autonomy → mitigate risks.

1) Define SLIs & SLOs for agent workflows

Category

SLI (what to measure)

Example SLO

How to measure

Answer quality

Faithfulness (0–1), answer relevancy

≥0.85 faithfulness p95 over rolling 7d

Ragas, LangSmith/Phoenix evals

Latency

End-to-end p95; tool-call p95

p95 < 2.0s

Tracing (Langfuse/LangSmith/Phoenix)

Retrieval

Context recall@k / precision@k

recall@5 ≥ 0.80

RAG eval (Qdrant/Pinecone guides)

Safety

Prompt-injection block rate; unsafe-output rate

≥99% blocks; <0.1% unsafe

OWASP checks; Content Safety

Cost

Tokens/request; tool-call count

≤$X per successful task

Tracing usage + budgeting

Sources:
Ragas metrics · Qdrant: RAG evaluation · Pinecone: RAG eval · Implementing SLOs

2) Evaluate early and continuously (offline + online)

3) Observe everything (traces, tools, costs)

4) Control autonomy

5) Secure-by-default

Common failure modes → proven fixes

  1. “Same prompt, different answer.”

    • Why: non-determinism, silent model updates, concurrency.

    • Fix: set temperature=0, use seeds when available, pin model versions, run regression evals on every update.
      Temp=0 clarifications · Version pinning

  2. Slow or time-outing flows at peak.

    • Why: tail latency in upstream services; serial tool calls.

    • Fix: parallelize idempotent steps, hedged requests, timeouts with fallback plans; prewarm caches.
      Tail at Scale

  3. Rate-limit storms and 429 cascades.

    • Fix: client-side exponential backoff + jitter, adaptive concurrency, token budgets per route.
      OpenAI: backoff

  4. Prompt injection via RAG or tools.

    • Why: untrusted content is executed as instructions.

    • Fix: content scanning, system-prompt hardening, instruction-following validation, deny by default for tool calls; display provenance.
      OWASP LLM Top 10 · Azure Prompt Shields

  5. RAG answers go off-script.

    • Why: bad chunks, drifted embeddings, weak retrievers.

    • Fix: monitor context recall@k/precision@k, chunk/merge tuning, hybrid (sparse+dense), structured metadata filters; faithfulness scoring.
      Qdrant RAG eval · Pinecone guide · Ragas: Faithfulness

  6. Agent loops & tool thrash.

  7. Context window overflow.

Small comparison: observability & eval tooling


Tool

Best for

Highlights

Links

Langfuse (OSS)

Tracing, cost/latency analytics

OpenTelemetry-native SDK, sessions, scoring

Docs

LangSmith

Agent traces + offline/online eval

LLM-as-judge, datasets, regressions

Docs

Arize Phoenix (OSS)

Open-source evals + traces

Python/TS evals, RAG diagnostics

Docs

Braintrust

Evals at scale + online monitors

Experiments API, online scoring

Docs

Step-by-step rollout: 30 days to production reliability

Days 0–3 — Choose one workflow & write SLOs

Days 4–10 — Build the “thin slice” with guardrails

  • Add max iterations/timeouts, retries with exponential backoff, early abort on repeat error patterns.

  • Instrument tracing for prompts, retrieved context, tool calls, latency, cost.
    OpenAI: backoff · Langfuse

Days 11–18 — Evaluation & hardening

  • Create a 100–500 example golden set; run offline evals (faithfulness, recall@k); fix chunking/hybrid search.

  • Add prompt-injection shields and input sanitization.
    Ragas metrics · OWASP LLM Top 10

Days 19–30 — Pilot with controls

Appendix: RAG metrics that actually matter

Further reading

We’re Here to Help

Ready to transform your operations? We're here to help. Contact us today to learn more about our innovative solutions and expert services.

We’re Here to Help

Ready to transform your operations? We're here to help. Contact us today to learn more about our innovative solutions and expert services.

We’re Here to Help

Ready to transform your operations? We're here to help. Contact us today to learn more about our innovative solutions and expert services.